Germany’s response to the refugee situation, catalyzed by the Ukrainian crisis and other global conflicts, has been multifaceted, focusing on economic integration and welfare policy reforms.
The country, having become a new home to over a million Ukrainian refugees since the Russian invasion, is now prioritizing their entry into the workforce, addressing both the humanitarian need and the domestic demand for skilled labor.
The German government, recognizing the potential of Ukrainian refugees who have acquired a working knowledge of German, is actively promoting their employment. Labour Minister Hubertus Heil has highlighted the successful employment of 132,000 Ukrainians, yet he underscores that this is just the beginning. Aiming to leverage the skills of approximately 400,000 individuals who are on the cusp of completing integration courses, the government has launched what Minister Heil terms a “job turbo” initiative.
This initiative is a concerted effort by job centers to increase their engagement with refugees, setting a target of meetings every six weeks to guide them towards suitable employment opportunities and address any impediments to their employment. This approach is not without its expectations; refugees are encouraged to actively participate in the job market, with the caveat that refusal to accept work offers could lead to a reduction in jobless benefits.
Furthermore, the government seeks to expedite the recognition of foreign job qualifications. Daniel Terzenbach, appointed as a special envoy at the Federal Labour Agency, will steer this crucial aspect of workforce integration.
Parallel to these efforts, there is a growing debate about the welfare support extended to refugees. The Association of German Counties, through its president Reinhard Sager, has proposed a shift for future Ukrainian refugees, from receiving citizen’s money to being supported under the Asylum Seekers’ Benefits Act. This change aims to address the concerns about the financial sustainability of providing Bürgergeld to all new refugees, given the increasing numbers and the strain they place on local resources.
This stance has been met with a mixture of support and criticism. The association warns of the potential burden on social systems due to the influx and advocates for a transition from monetary to in-kind benefits for asylum seekers, alongside an enforced obligation for refugees to seek employment.
Tareq Alaows from Pro Asyl opposes these suggested changes, warning that they could lead to a two-tier system among Ukrainian refugees and violate the principle of legal equality. Similarly, migration expert Herbert Brücker, associated with the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) of the Federal Employment Agency, warns against placing undue emphasis on social benefits as a primary factor for migration. Brücker’s research indicates that most refugees prioritize legal stability, the prospects of fair asylum procedures, and human rights respect over economic incentives.
Moreover, Brücker points out the constitutional requirement to ensure the existential minimum for asylum seekers, thus limiting the scope of potential cuts to their support. He also questions the effectiveness of measures such as blocking financial remittances abroad, given that the benefits provided are too modest to allow for significant transfers.
Brücker further suggests a strategic redistribution of refugees throughout Germany, correcting past practices of placing many in economically weak regions with high unemployment rates. This, he argues, has significantly dampened their chances for successful integration.
The dialogue surrounding the integration of Ukrainian refugees into the German labor market and the reevaluation of their welfare support is ongoing. The government’s proactive stance on employment integration, juxtaposed with county-level concerns about welfare sustainability, reflects the broader challenges that Germany faces as it seeks to balance humanitarian obligations with socio-economic realities.
As Germany continues to adapt to these challenges, the outcome of these policies will have lasting implications not only for the refugees but also for the country’s labor market and social welfare system. The integration of refugees into the workforce stands as a testament to Germany’s commitment to providing opportunities for new arrivals while pragmatically addressing the concerns of its own citizens and resource capabilities.