German Chancellor Merz Breaks Political Silence with Blunt Criticism of Israel’s Gaza Campaign

German Leadership Takes a Public Stand on Gaza

In a move that marks a striking shift in Germany’s official tone, Chancellor Friedrich Merz has openly criticized Israel’s military campaign in the Gaza Strip. His remarks came during an interview at the European Forum hosted by German broadcaster WDR, where he described the situation as both a “human tragedy” and a “political catastrophe.” He questioned the current objectives of the Israeli army in Gaza and emphasized the need to speak out when humanitarian law appears to be violated.

This statement marks the clearest public criticism of Israel from a sitting German chancellor since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023. Until now, German leaders had largely avoided publicly scrutinizing Israel’s conduct, citing historical sensitivities and a policy of unwavering solidarity rooted in Germany’s post-Holocaust responsibility. Merz, however, made clear that while history must be acknowledged, silence cannot be an excuse in the face of humanitarian violations.

A Measured Yet Impactful Break with Tradition

Chancellor Merz’s tone has been described by analysts as significant, not only because of its content but because of its source. His words were especially notable given his affiliation with the CDU party, a faction that had previously shown strong alignment with Israeli government policies.

Merz clarified that he did not take his statements lightly, given Germany’s unique historical ties to Israel. But he stressed that when the lives of civilians—particularly women and children—are continuously endangered, even Germany must reassess its position. His statement was not accompanied by threats of diplomatic consequences or sanctions, but the symbolic weight of his criticism alone has stirred debate in both Berlin and Jerusalem.

The response from Israel was unexpectedly restrained. Israeli Ambassador to Germany, Ron Prosor, acknowledged the remarks and said they were being listened to “very carefully,” emphasizing that they came from a “friend.” This lack of immediate backlash from Israeli leadership has been interpreted as a sign of respect for Merz’s approach and an acknowledgment of the growing international concern over the humanitarian toll in Gaza.

A Humanitarian Catastrophe Unfolds

Since October 2023, Israel’s military operations in Gaza have led to the deaths of more than 53,000 Palestinians and the injury of over 120,000 more, according to United Nations figures. The majority of casualties have been civilians, including a high proportion of children. These numbers continue to rise amid ongoing airstrikes, with schools, hospitals, and refugee shelters among the reported targets. Israeli authorities have justified these actions by alleging that Hamas uses civilian infrastructure for military purposes, though independent evidence to support many of these claims remains lacking.

All public hospitals in northern Gaza have ceased to function. A strict Israeli blockade has led to extreme shortages of food, clean water, and medical supplies. Humanitarian agencies report that tens of thousands of children are facing starvation, and there is growing fear that parts of the territory may already be experiencing famine conditions.

The International Court of Justice has stated that allegations of genocide by Israel appear “plausible,” further intensifying international scrutiny. Despite this, many countries—including Germany until now—had avoided strong language or condemnation.

Internal Shifts in German Political and Media Circles

Merz’s statements reflect a broader, if slow-moving, change in German political discourse. Until recently, most criticism of Israel’s actions came from outside the mainstream. Former Chancellor Olaf Scholz had previously set the tone for Germany’s response, expressing total solidarity with Israel and declaring confidence in its adherence to international law. This stance, once largely unchallenged, has become increasingly difficult to maintain as the situation in Gaza worsens.

Media commentators and public intellectuals in Germany are beginning to push back against what some describe as a “sect-like” political loyalty to Israel. Daniel Gerlach, a prominent Middle East expert, commented that parts of Germany’s political elite had become impervious to rational debate, preferring simplified narratives that absolve Israel of all responsibility. His remarks reflect a growing frustration among those who believe Germany must pursue a more balanced foreign policy based on humanitarian principles.

The CDU’s previous silence is also under reevaluation. Merz’s comments, though late by some accounts, may inspire others in politics and media who have remained quiet out of fear of being labeled antisemitic. His statement opens the door for a more nuanced discussion, one that recognizes both the trauma of October 7 and the disproportionate impact of Israel’s response on the civilian population of Gaza.

Rethinking the “Staatsräson” Doctrine

For decades, Germany’s approach to Israel has been defined by the principle of Staatsräson—the notion that Israel’s security is part of Germany’s national interest. This doctrine, while symbolically powerful, has also made open criticism of Israeli policy politically sensitive. Merz’s decision to speak out may mark the beginning of a shift in how that principle is interpreted and applied.

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul also recently met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, signaling continued diplomatic engagement despite the critical tone from Berlin. Words such as “unbearable” and “disproportionate” have now entered official statements, hinting at a reassessment of Germany’s diplomatic language.

This change in tone comes amid a broader international rethinking of alliances and responsibilities in the Middle East. While the German government has not altered its official support for Israel’s right to defend itself, the definition of that right—and the limits of acceptable action—are now being openly questioned.